This
past week’s One Health Intellectual Exchange Group’s topic focusing on
microbial source tracking in bodies of water was presented by Dr. Jill
Stewart. As an Assistant Professor in
the Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering at the University of
North Carolina, Dr. Stewart develops techniques to detect and track pathogens
in water. Dr. Stewart’s current research
projects involve water quality evaluation associated with land application of
waste products and water quality evaluation associated with urbanization on
watersheds. Her work with environmental
sciences show how environmental impacts can affect human health.
During
the presentation, Dr. Stewart addressed the following learning objectives:
- Name a standard indicator used to detect fecal pollution of surface waters.
- List three issues associated with the use of traditional fecal indicator bacteria to monitor water quality.
- Define microbial source tracking and name a marker that can be used to track human-source pollution in water.
- Describe how microbial source tracking can be used to mitigate water pollution.
The
presentation began with an introduction on microbial pollution and microbial
detection. Dr. Stewart works with
bacteria, viruses, and protozoa.
Microbial pollution on water and shellfish include various sources such
as waste water treatment plants, marinas, wild and domestic animals,
recreational use, and food (for example, oysters). In order to detect the microbes, membrane
filtration is performed and fecal coliform colonies are analyzed. This technique is widely used; however, there
are some drawbacks. Disadvantages
include time (it takes about twenty-four hours to complete), type of pathogen
(it only works for bacteria), and determination of contamination source. Microbial Source Tracking (MST) is the method
to determine fecal pollution in water sources.
Molecular techniques such as PCR and assays are also incorporated. Markers of fecal microorganisms are used for
analysis. Fecal indicator bacteria
includes Escherichia coli. Depending on the presence of markers, fecal
pollution can be linked to land development or other human causes.
The
remaining of the presentation focused on two of Dr. Stewart’s studies. One of Dr. Stewart’s studies was conducted at
Jordan Lake. The purpose of the study
was to determine storm water and land use effects on microbial
contamination. Water samples were
collected at various types of area uses and different storm times. The fecal indicator bacteria were compared at
a regulatory threshold, and the markers used were Bacteroides sp. (HuBac) and Methanobrevibacter
smithii (nifH). There was a positive correlation between land
development and microbial contamination.
Storms had more of a contaminant load, and loading occurred over the
course of the storm. Therefore, there
was no difference in loading between dry conditions and stormy conditions.
A
second study discussed by Dr. Stewart concerned fecal indicator bacteria and
swine farms. Eastern North Carolina has
most of the state’s swine operations, and North Carolina is the nation’s second
largest state in swine production. To
control swine fecal waste, common applications are swine lagoons and spraying
fields. Again, Dr. Stewart found that
there were higher levels of fecal indicator bacteria with rain. Swine genetic markers analyzed included
pig-1-BAC, pig-2-BAC, and pig-BAC-2. The
markers pig-1-BAC and pig-2-BAC were found to be correlated with pig
waste.
In
addition to her studies within North Carolina, Dr. Stewart also collaborates
with researchers in the Galápagos Islands.
A few studies were conducted by measuring water quality around sewage
pipes, which emptied into the ocean. The
water treatment plants also had fecal indicator bacteria. Dr. Stewart along with students will continue
research in the Galápagos Islands.
The
presentation concluded with Dr. Stewart stressing that single-sample monitoring
for water sources may be inadequate, and alternative indicators may be
necessary. These points are exemplified
in her studies with land use and water contamination as well as storm water affects
on water contamination. Her presentation
and studies support the One Health concept connecting environmental health and
human health.
Discussion
and questions followed the presentation.
Questions included the following topics:
- The affect of tides and timing on the analysis of storm water leaving sewage pipes in the Galápagos Islands
- Analyzing antibiotics directly in samples
- Water pollution by tour boats in the Galápagos Islands
- Collaborative work with Engineers Without Borders in the Galápagos Islands
- The difference between indicators and pathogens
- Costs for molecular techniques
- The use of caffeine as an indicator
Post
Authored by Erin Beasley
NC State University
No comments:
Post a Comment